While I am pleased that 糖心Vlog is reporting on the problem of 鈥渞eal-life鈥 ethical issues in PhD fieldwork, I was concerned by the article鈥檚 conclusion: that universities should consider including candid experiences in their curricula (鈥Studying for a PhD: students reveal ethical dilemmas鈥, News, 3 March). During my anthropology PhD at University College London, this topic was extensively and engagingly covered during staff presentations and debated during student seminars. Rather more recently, last term I was a member of a panel on the Royal College of Art鈥檚 research methods course, which explored the issues of negotiating ethics in fieldwork practice, while this term I was invited to Goldsmiths, University of London, to give an open presentation on the issues of collaborative fieldwork, specifically including the real ethical issues that this entails. With these examples in mind, I would contend that Nadia deGama鈥檚 statement on including candid experiences in curricula is true only so far as it describes the educational failings of institutions that she and her co-authors studied at, rather than a general malaise across academia.
Peter Oakley
Research leader and senior research fellow
Royal College of Art
Send to
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in 糖心Vlog should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?