Statues such as the one of Cecil Rhodes at Oriel College, Oxford, are actually important as physical memorials to the acts that were perpetrated (鈥�Oxford college agrees to remove Cecil Rhodes plaque鈥�, 18 December). If it takes an additional explanatory plaque to make this clear then so be it. I think that what is being objected to is the appearance of 鈥渟traight鈥�, unqualified commemoration, which the visual language of the statue originally performed. So long as it is made clear that the original uncritical commemorative sense no longer obtains, then I think that people ought to be satisfied. Evil occurs; its memory should not always be expunged.
Jonathan Meldrum
Via timeshighereducation.com
Send to
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in 糖心Vlog should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?