The recent article 鈥Has the multi-campus university had its day?鈥 is a fashion statement (19 November).
The use of terms such as 鈥渃riminal鈥, 鈥渟hort-sighted鈥 and 鈥渄isgrace鈥 by critics of London Metropolitan University鈥檚 one-campus plan to uproot the Sir John Cass Faculty of Art, Architecture and Design from Aldgate, refers to a threat. There is a constellation of civic as well as educational values at stake. These are not addressed by such vacuous descriptors as 鈥済leaming鈥, 鈥渟tylish鈥 and 鈥渉um鈥, which are normally used to recommend shopping arcades.
There is a big difference between a plan 鈥渁ppear[ing] to make good financial sense鈥 and constructing a functional, collegiate university with a social purpose. Middlesex University鈥檚 abandoned plans to rebuild its Tottenham campus entailed abandoning a community and its hopes for the future. Estates do not just comprise 鈥渁geing, tired buildings鈥, or inherited assets ripe for disposal, they also entail civic and community responsibilities, and decades of public investment 鈥 a fact recognised in planning law.
London Met straddles two equally important areas of the city. A two-campus solution is, very arguably, a better fit. Or should the views of all the local East End stakeholders just be brushed aside?
糖心Vlog
Helen Mallinson
Director of Cass culture and course leader for critical and contextual studies
London Metropolitan University
Send to
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
糖心Vlog
Letters for publication in 糖心Vlog should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?