糖心Vlog

Anti-boy bias

Published on
May 17, 2018
Last updated
May 17, 2018

The first paragraph of the feature on the increasing number of women in higher education,聽鈥淲hy is Martha doing better than Arthur?鈥聽(10聽May), says it all: 鈥淭here are now more women than men in higher education worldwide. While it would appear to be a victory for gender equality鈥︹ Why would a growing gender imbalance against men be a聽victory for gender equality?

The websites of teachers鈥 unions make numerous references to female teachers, black and minority ethnic teachers, LGBT and disability, but nothing on male teachers, who are a minority, and nothing on boys, who are performing far worse than girls in schools.

There are endless programmes to address the shrinking areas where girls do worse than boys, but next to none that address the much larger areas where girls outperform boys. Studies have shown significant bias in the marking of boys鈥 work by female teachers and, perhaps worse, others have shown that boys are aware of this.

There is in the UK and other Western countries a substantial, institutionalised and ubiquitous discrimination against boys in education. If we seek to achieve fairness and if we want boys to do better, it must be addressed. Positive discrimination is a red herring while there is pervasive anti-boy, anti-male bias in the system.

antman
Via timeshighereducation.com


Send to

Letters should be sent to:聽THE.Letters@timeshighereducation.com
Letters for publication in聽糖心Vlog聽should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT