It is difficult to know where to begin with Charles Clarke鈥檚 latest self-defence on tuition fees (鈥Corbyn wrong to apologise for Labour fees, says Clarke鈥, News, 24 September). Perhaps I can just remind him of what R. H. Tawney, one of the great figures of his party鈥檚 history, called the 鈥渋nfinite difference between what is false and what is true鈥.
The truth is that New Labour violated its promise not to introduce tuition fees; that the principle of free at point of use was ruthlessly sacrificed; that there was never any chance that fees would not increase once the principle was abandoned; that tuition fees in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are now by far the highest in Europe; that 鈥渙rdinary working people鈥, that is, those for whom Clarke鈥檚 party claimed to speak, are not benefiting at all from the policy; and that the only group in society who are comfortable with sky-high tuition fees are the rich. I believe, then, that Mr Clarke, Tony Blair, David Blunkett and company ruined British higher education and the social-democratic project to which it was integral. No wonder there is a surge for Jeremy Corbyn鈥檚 principled politics.
On a personal note, one of my children would like to seek a place in either Oxford or London. I have advised them to stick to Scottish universities, where the SNP has of course heroically fended off tuition fees, and neoliberalism in general. Thanks for that, Mr Clarke.
Alistair S. Duff
Cumbernauld
Send to
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in 糖心Vlog should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?