糖心Vlog

Use and abuse of abuse

Published on
February 20, 2014
Last updated
June 10, 2015

Following the news that an English lecturer from the University of Nottingham has apologised for describing a third-year student as an 鈥渋diot鈥 and 鈥渟emi-literate鈥 on Facebook, our Deputy Head of Student Experience, Nancy Harbinger, has issued new guidelines to circumvent the possibility of any such academic imprudence within our own university.

In a top priority memorandum emailed to all academic staff, Ms听Harbinger recognises what she calls 鈥渢he traditional right of academics to use evaluative terms to characterise individual students鈥. She also acknowledges that 鈥渨here pedagogic circumstances provide the justification鈥, it may be appropriate to make use of such pejorative terms as 鈥渋diotic鈥欌, 鈥渟emi-literate鈥 and 鈥渆ven such vernacular characterisations as 鈥榯wo sandwiches short of a picnic鈥欌娾.

However, she insists that these and similar terms should never be posted on social media sites but should be confined to whispered asides in 鈥渟uch traditional arenas for student abuse as senior common rooms鈥.

More public comments about idiotic or semi-literate students should rely on the well-established alternative formulations: 鈥淥nly just satisfactory鈥, 鈥淩ecurrently marginal鈥 or 鈥淢ay well have to settle for a lower鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Will it fit in my seminar room?

Poppletonian robot

Our Corporate Director of Human Resources, Louise Bimpson, has responded vigorously to the recent contention in 糖心Vlog by Martin McQuillan, dean of arts and social sciences at Kingston University, that the proposed involvement of the Consumers鈥 Association in university assessment would give a totally wrong impression of the nature of higher education.

Although Ms Bimpson agreed that the concept of 鈥渂est buy鈥 could be misleading when it was used to distinguish between different universities, she believed that the concept had 鈥渄iscriminating power鈥 when applied to individual members of academic staff. In this respect, she listed a recent Which?-style evaluation of Professor Gordon Lapping, of our Department of Media and Cultural Studies:

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The Lapping

Will it fit in your seminar room?
The Lapping has slimmed down a听great deal since the last pay rise and will now slide easily behind a听standard size desk and still leave enough space in the room to accommodate up to 24 students.

How noisy is it?
The Lapping starts with a听loud whirring engaged sound, but this soon reduces to a barely audible whimper as the cycle progresses.

How much energy does it use in a听typical cycle?
The Lapping will run for approximately 45 minutes on three cups of听coffee, a muesli bar and four Nurofen.

Does it remove all known stains?
The Lapping removes some faulty generalisations and one or two undistributed middles, but can also leave large unsightly patches of ignorance.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Is the Lapping free-standing?
Earlier models could stand entirely on their own, but the latest model needs to sit down a听lot in the afternoon.

Does it remove all odours?
At the end of each cycle, there is a discernible whiff of ennui.

Thought for the week

(contributed by Jennifer Doubleday, Head of Personal Development)

In next week鈥檚 Thursday seminar, Professor G.鈥塊. Diploid, who was recently a member of the team that identified the genetic basis of homosexuality, will describe his team鈥檚 latest discovery of the genetic basis for a tendency to propagate higher forms of听nonsense.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

lolsoc@dircon.co.uk

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs