糖心Vlog

Twitter and blogs are not add-ons to research

The best academics are those that build a form of public dialogue into their work

Published on
August 28, 2014
Last updated
June 10, 2015

Source: Twin Design/Shutterstock.com

鈥淚mpact is an awkward thing in British 糖心Vlog,鈥 writes Tim Hitchcock, professor of digital history at the University of Sussex, on .

鈥淢ost of the time it feels like just one more bludgeon used to batter hapless academics into submission,鈥 he adds. 鈥淎nd yet no one spends a lifetime researching, teaching and writing about something if they don鈥檛 believe it is important 鈥 if they don鈥檛 believe that what they do contributes to a better world. We all want to have 鈥榠mpact鈥.鈥 The question, the blog states, is how to achieve impact 鈥渋n a way that reflects our own values鈥.

鈥淭his question is all the more important because our traditional assumptions about how our work affects a broader social discourse seem increasingly threadbare,鈥 Professor Hitchcock continues.

鈥淲hen the print run of most monographs number just a few hundred copies (most of which disappear in to American research libraries, never to be read or used), and when journal articles proliferate beyond [that] number because they serve the needs of big publishing, rather than academic dialogue, we need to think harder about how we do the job of the humanities.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

If scholars continue to have 鈥渟mall (vociferous) conversations amongst ourselves, in professional seminars and at conferences鈥, then they will soon 鈥渓ose [their] place in the broader social dialogue鈥, says the blog, which is also published on the .

鈥淚f there is a 鈥榗risis鈥 in the humanities, it lies in how we have our public debates, rather than in their content.鈥 The solution, the blog says, is 鈥渁ll around us鈥: sharing.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淭he best (and most successful) academics聽are the ones who are so caught up in the importance of their work, so caught up with their simple passion for a subject, that they publicise it with every breath,鈥 Professor Hitchcock says.

He praises the early career scholars who have dismissed concerns that exposing their research too early 鈥渨ill either open them to ridicule, or allow someone else to 鈥榮teal鈥 their ideas鈥.

鈥淚n my experience, the most successful early career humanists have already started building a form of public dialogue in to their academic practice.鈥

He gives examples, including Ben Schmidt, assistant professor of history at Northeastern University, whose charts his work on using modern techniques to answer questions about 19th-century America; and Helen Rogers, reader in 19th-century studies at Liverpool John Moores University, who shares excerpts from her forthcoming book, Conviction: Stories from a Nineteenth-century Prison, on .

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淭he most impressive thing about these blogs (and the academic careers that generate them) is that there is no waste 鈥 what starts as a blog, ends as an academic output, and an output with a ready-made audience, eager to cite it,鈥 Professor Hitchcock says.

鈥淏etween them, Twitter and blogging just make good academic sense. And while you need to avoid all the kittens and trolls, clickbait and self-promoting gits, these forms of social media are rapidly evolving in to the places where the academic community is embodied.鈥

Send links to topical, insightful and quirky online comment by and about academics to chris.parr@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT