Is it time to move 鈥渂eyond the silly hype鈥 about massive open online courses?
Ferdinand von Prondzynski, vice-chancellor of Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, thinks so. He , A University Blog, to make that very point.
鈥淎 year or two ago a number of people who wanted to grab a bit of public attention in higher education claimed loudly that MOOCs (鈥榤assive open online courses鈥) were the future, and that all universities would have to go down this route,鈥 he writes 鈥 linking to a 糖心Vlog article from last year in which Don Nutbeam, vice-chancellor of the University of Southampton, urged institutions to produce Moocs or face dire consequences. 鈥淚t鈥檚 Mooc or die. More to the point, do it quickly,鈥 Professor Nutbeam said at the time.
Despite the lack of a declared business plan for both universities and Mooc platforms, Professor von Prondzynski continues, 鈥渢he hype continued to roll and seemed to have the capacity to persuade rational commentators that MOOCs were the future鈥.
糖心Vlog
鈥淣ot even the really annoying acronym seemed to be able to put people off,鈥 he writes.
A couple of years later, however, although Moocs are still around, the 鈥渙ver-excited breathless rhetoric has calmed down鈥 鈥 which is a source of relief for the Scotland-based vice-chancellor.
糖心Vlog
He cites a move by Mooc platforms towards making agreements with big business 鈥 namely Coursera, the US Mooc provider, which recently announced that it is to work with companies such as MasterCard and Shell, among others, to provide courses for employees.
鈥淔ew people now think that MOOCs will turn higher education upside down. Nobody is arguing any more [that] all universities must offer hundreds of MOOCs or perish. More importantly, most now accept that a university course with thousands of students that generates absolutely no income cannot be the way forward for the system.鈥
Instead, he says, there is a growing movement to consider how online learning can be used to improve teaching, and how online courses can provide a viable income stream.
鈥淪ome universities (e.g. Georgia Tech) are now charging a tuition fee for such courses, though admittedly the fee is rather lower than for the 鈥榥ormal鈥 on-campus programme.鈥
糖心Vlog
A two-year Mooc-style master鈥檚 degree in computer science at the US institution is initially expected to be below $7,000 (拢4,260) 鈥 far less than a traditional degree.
鈥淢ore generally,鈥 Professor von Prondzynski says, 鈥渢he much more reasonable agenda now is to find ways in which the MOOCs experience can support new developments that will bring higher education of good quality to larger audiences and how these participants can be properly supported.鈥
He concludes that it is clear that online learning will be a major part of the future, and that it is right to suggest that some disruptive change may improve what universities do.
鈥淚t is reasonable to argue that the traditional model of higher education cannot be the only way to offer teaching and learning. But it is also good not to get carried away by each new bit of hype.鈥
糖心Vlog
Send links to topical, insightful and quirky online comment by and about academics to chris.parr@tesglobal.com
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?
