糖心Vlog

Pitfalls to avoid when teaching online courses via a campus platform

Remember that everyone is watching your online lectures

Published on
January 1, 2015
Last updated
June 10, 2015

There are 鈥渢wo things you can be sure of when you teach online via a campus platform鈥, , an English professor at George Washington University in the US, on her University Diaries blog.

Number one? 鈥淵our university is watching.鈥 Number two? 鈥淭here鈥檚 a written record of everything you say.鈥

鈥淎ll sorts of eyes are peering into your online course,鈥 she continues. 鈥淵our students, naturally; but also university administrators, on-campus tech people, the for-profit firm your school has probably hired to manage various course functions.鈥

This, Professor Soltan concludes, 鈥渋s not a freedom-rich environment鈥 where you can fail to run the course properly before 鈥済iving everyone an A鈥 and most certainly 鈥渘ot for sexual harassment鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

She is referring to two separate stories. The first, in 2011, relates to when students who were enrolled on a programme received A grades for two online classes for which they never received any instruction. The students, remarkably, were allowed to keep the credit that they had earned (after their coursework was actually reviewed) and also received a refund.

Shortly after the incident, Venetia Orcutt, who had been assigned to teach the courses, resigned.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The reference to 鈥渟exual harassment鈥 made in Professor Soltan鈥檚 blog relates to a more recent incident at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In December, the university announced that it had , physics professor and New York Times-declared 鈥渨eb star鈥, after the lecturer was found to have violated its sexual harassment policy.

The statement does not give many details about the incident, but does state that the decision to remove lectures from its online portals had been taken in response to a complaint received in October from a woman 鈥渃laiming online sexual harassment by Lewin鈥.

鈥淪he provided information about Lewin鈥檚 interactions with her, which began when she was a learner in one of his [online] courses, as well as information about interactions between Lewin and other women online learners,鈥 the statement reads.

MIT immediately began an investigation, and as a precaution instructed Professor Lewin not to contact any MIT students or online learners, either current or former.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淏ased on its investigation, MIT has determined that Lewin鈥檚 behavior toward the complainant violated the Institute鈥檚 policy on sexual harassment. Following broad consultation among faculty, MIT is indefinitely removing Lewin鈥檚 online courses, in the interest of preventing any further inappropriate behavior.鈥

Videos of Lewin鈥檚 lectures, which he himself described as 鈥渧ery special鈥, 鈥渋nspiring鈥 and 鈥渧ery funny鈥, had amassed millions of views online.

鈥淪tudents place tremendous trust in their teachers,鈥 said MIT president L. Rafael Reif. 鈥淒eserving that trust is among our most fundamental obligations.

鈥淲e must take the greatest care that everyone who comes to us for knowledge and instruction, whether in classrooms or online, can count on MIT as a safe and respectful place to learn.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Send links to topical, insightful and quirky online comment by and about academics to chris.parr@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT