糖心Vlog

Modern British Playwriting: The 1950s: Voices, Documents, New Interpretations

Published on
February 28, 2013
Last updated
May 22, 2015

Author: David Pattie
Edition: First
Publisher: Methuen Drama
Pages: 352
Price: 拢16.99
ISBN: 97814081292

Doubtless there will be those who object to dividing the history of the 20th and early 21st centuries into decades but I am not one of them. What you lose in complexity, you gain in concentration. In any case, Modern British Playwriting: The 1950s does not shirk from describing the Spirograph structure of post-war Britain.

The country was caught between two conflicting demands - the desire to maintain its status as a great power and the need to create a fairer society

This volume鈥檚 introduction presents the country as caught between two conflicting demands - the desire to maintain its status as a great power and the need to create a fairer and more just society - at a time when there was not enough money for both. The Suez Crisis shattered the illusion that Britannia still ruled the waves, while, later, Margaret Thatcher finally destroyed the hope of a new Jerusalem.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Tensions also marked the cultural scene. Richard Hoggart famously gave voice to anxieties about mass culture in his landmark work The Uses of Literacy: Aspects of Working Class Life (1957), anxieties that come to a head in Beatie Bryant鈥檚 closing speech in Arnold Wesker鈥檚 magnificent 1959 play Roots: 鈥淭he whole stinkin鈥 commercial world insults us and we don鈥檛 care a damn. Well Ronnie鈥檚 right - it鈥檚 our own bloody fault. We want the third-rate - we got it!鈥 On the other hand there were those who thought that 鈥渏azz, Hollywood movies and detective stories should not be despised or ignored鈥. What artists, intellectuals and thinkers liked about popular culture was its immediacy; it was egalitarian to the extent that you didn鈥檛 require specialised knowledge to enjoy it.

All this provides a background for understanding the theatre of the period, which was as thickly textured as the rest of society. Arthur Miller, looking on from the US, claimed that British theatre 鈥渨as hermetically sealed against the way society moves鈥. In London鈥檚 West End perhaps. But the Royal Court and Joan Littlewood鈥檚 Theatre Workshop showed that theatre could reflect and possibly even direct social change.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The largest section of the book is devoted to playwrights and plays. Terence Rattigan may not have had John Osborne鈥檚 rhetoric but he had something more valuable; sincerity of feeling. Osborne鈥檚 Look Back in Anger did not start a revolution; it was the culmination of one. The play lectures its audience. Quite a contrast to Wesker鈥檚 The Kitchen, which involves them in the dialogue. 鈥淲hat is there more?鈥 asks the restaurant owner now that he has given his workers a living wage. To which one answer may be 鈥渉appiness鈥. But as Samuel Beckett then asked: what do you do, once you鈥檙e happy?

There are some fascinating interviews in this collection, one of which is with the theatre critic Harold Hobson - an early advocate of Harold Pinter鈥檚 work - and an afterword that brings a number of themes nicely together, although without any sense of ultimate closure.

Life remains complicated. But my view of this book can be expressed simply. Put it on your course reading list immediately.

Who is it for?
It鈥檚 a must for undergraduates and postgraduates studying British theatre.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Presentation:
Clear, well-organised and packed with useful information.

Would you recommend it?
You bet.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT