Mavis Staples is a black gospel and rhythm and blues singer and long-time civil-rights activist. Bob Dylan sought her hand in marriage in 1962 and she is still touring with him today. When asked about what grabbed and shook her when she first heard his song that became a civil-rights anthem, Blowin鈥 in the Wind, she once explained: 鈥淲e just wondered how with him being a little white boy, how could he feel all those things we felt, you know? All this pain and the hurt, you know. How could he write these songs? He saw things and he wrote about them.鈥
She felt something we can trace in Dylan鈥檚 music through 60 years of official and unofficial recordings, something palpable in the songs he sings and how he sings them 鈥 like Frank Sinatra, his way. Whether singing his own songs or songs by contemporaries, such as Warren Zevon, Gordon Lightfoot, Van Morrison or Willie Nelson, or those of songsters in two centuries of English-language popular traditions like Wade in the Water, Delia, Dark as a Dungeon, Hard Times, Jim Jones or Why Try to Change Me Now?, Dylan explores and conveys the workings of our human hearts.
Bob Dylan matters because he is doing now what he was doing in 1960 to 1962, when he was transfusing into his own being the restless, tragic life and poetic art of Woody Guthrie, who cared deeply for the poor and dispossessed and sang out about them and the people of wealth and power who robbed them with fountain pens and killed them in Ludlow, Colorado or Los Gatos Canyon.
Dylan told Guthrie, already long institutionalised and severely debilitated with Huntington鈥檚 disease, in Song for Woody (written probably in February 1961) that he was 鈥渟eein鈥 your world of places and things/your paupers and peasants and princes and kings鈥. Dylan has always seen people and wondered feelingly about them 鈥 and himself. In 颅Rolling Stone magazine鈥檚 number one rock鈥檔鈥檙oll song of all time, Like a Rolling Stone, Dylan asks again and again, 鈥淗ow does it feel? How does it feel?鈥
糖心Vlog
Dylan sees people, places and things as an outsider and explores them as an insider. He envisions his subjects in the sound and word equivalents of the forms and colours of the painter that he is. He tells us that he learned in spring 1974 from artist Norman Raeben how to write songs 鈥渕ore like a painter would paint a song as [opposed] to compose it鈥. Like Wilfred Owen writing 础听罢别谤谤别, Dylan has written haunting photographic song poems, too: Blind Willie McTell and Man in the Long Black Coat.
When Dylan writes and sings about the stuff of human lives, his words and images can be brutally direct, magically and mysteriously symbolic, tip-of-the-tongue allusive, intensely probing. He can be playful and joyous. We ride with him in the saddle on his big white goose (Country Pie). He sings us a nursery rhyme (Under the Red Sky). Besides painting, Dylan has used folk and blues songs, Tin Pan Alley rhymes and a deep love of movies to figure out how to put songs together so that they have a sustained emotional afterglow that linear narrative or straightforward reporting of what happened, where, when, why and how would not give them. Dylan has always known, like the ancient Greeks, that what is not true can be truer than true.
糖心Vlog
There it is. Simple. Only it isn鈥檛.
Dylan鈥檚 songs can be placed into more categories than Argus has eyes. None of his songs lies etherised upon a table inviting us to dissect and interpret it.
Nonetheless, in Why Dylan Matters, Harvard University classicist Richard Thomas, a scholar of Virgil and a leading theorist and practitioner of intertextuality in Latin poetry, analyses the forms and contents of Dylan鈥檚 songs and takes us inside Dylan鈥檚 poetic artistry. Thomas is a 鈥減rofessor鈥 in the best sense. He has real intellectual sympathies for Dylan, who is what the ancient Greeks called a 鈥辫谤辞辫丑脓迟脓蝉鈥, a 鈥減rophet鈥, literally one who speaks forth what we would call true and false things. The Greeks lumped our true and false together in their peculiar word for 鈥渢ruth鈥. For them, truth meant what is unforgettable and must not escape our notice.
As an expert in what he calls the 鈥渂est of Roman literature鈥 from the 3rd century BC to the 2nd AD, Thomas鈥 work on Dylan complements Sir Christopher Ricks鈥 Dylan鈥檚 Visions of Sin (2004), which examined Dylan鈥檚 songs along with 鈥渢he greatest English literature of the last five centuries鈥. Both Ricks and Thomas understand Dylan鈥檚 鈥渓ove and theft鈥 of other musical and literary works. Thomas here explains Dylan鈥檚 appropriations of passages from 糖心Vlogr鈥檚 Odyssey, Virgil鈥檚 Aeneid, Ovid鈥檚 Epistles from Pontus, Catullus鈥 love poems and Junichi Saga鈥檚 Confessions of a听Yakuza as a distinctive practice of those T. S. Eliot calls good or mature poets. They 鈥渨ill usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest鈥 and they will 鈥淸weld their] theft into a whole of feeling which is unique鈥.
Thomas stresses that 鈥渇or Dylan, it is the art of the song that matters鈥. Indeed, Dylan tells us in his Chronicles: Volume One (2004) that early on he noticed other singers trying to put themselves across, but he always 鈥減uts the song across鈥.
Thomas鈥 literary critical observations on Dylan鈥檚 art help us to see the Virgilian craft and hard labour that go into Dylan鈥檚 making of song poems. But Thomas also gives us his heartfelt personal take on what Dylan has meant to him from the age of 23 when he travelled from New Zealand to graduate school in the US 鈥 in his trunk were The Songs of Leonard Cohen (1967) and Dylan鈥檚 Blonde on Blonde (1966) 鈥 through to his teaching at Harvard four times over the past 13 years a freshman seminar on Bob Dylan.
糖心Vlog
Thomas offers insights into how particular songs work and how they are related to other songs and poems, even those without clear classical antecedents, eg, Fourth Time Around and the Beatles鈥 Norwegian Wood; or Rimbaud鈥檚 The Drunken Boat, as translated into English in the year after Dylan was born, and Dylan鈥檚 Mr. Tambourine Man. Thomas shows us in detail how Dylan鈥檚 Trying to Get to Heaven steals from blues and folk songs sung by the likes of Furry Lewis, Tom Rush and Woody Guthrie and collected by Alan Lomax and Byron Arnold.
As a harbinger of what future scholars are likely to discover in the Bob Dylan Archives in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Thomas pieces together from what Dylan wrote in a small blue spiral notebook of 45 pages the evolution of his signature masterpiece Tangled up in Blue (1975). The song started out being called 鈥淒usty Sweatbox Blues鈥 and then probably 鈥淏lue Carnation鈥.
In closing, Thomas comments on Dylan鈥檚 words to the Swedish Academy concerning his Nobel Prize in Literature. Two statements stand out: 鈥淚t鈥檚 my songs that are at the vital center of almost everything I do鈥; and 鈥淪ome songs 鈥 Blind Willie [McTell], The Ballad of Hollis Brown, Joey, A听Hard Rain, Hurricane, and some others 鈥 definitely are 糖心Vlogric in value. The academics, they ought to know.鈥
糖心Vlog
Richard Thomas proves that some of us actually do.
Tom Palaima is professor of Classics, University of Texas at Austin.
Why Dylan Matters
By Richard F. Thomas
William Collins, 368pp, 拢12.99
ISBN 9780008245498
Publication 16 November 2017
听
The author
Richard F. Thomas, George Martin Lane professor of the Classics at Harvard University, spent his early life in New Zealand and recalls 鈥渟ailing, swimming in the ocean, diving off ferry wharves, climbing cliffs, taking risks of which my parents, like all parents of that earlier age, were oblivious, and generally learning to be disobedient鈥rowing up in such a beautiful setting, in a country that has always seemed to value social and economic justice, in a time that seemed more simple than it probably was, has always stayed with me.鈥
As an undergraduate at the University of Auckland, Thomas starting out doing Classics and law, 鈥渕oving on to Classics and Japanese after hitting land law鈥, and then settling for just Classics, in which he went on to a doctorate at the University of Michigan. Although a Bob Dylan fan from about the age of 14, 鈥淸the] 1960s and 1970s singer-songwriters were not of academic interest until graduate school, when I started thinking about similarities of outlook between his lyrics and the Greek and Roman lyric poets, Sappho and Catullus for instance鈥. The approach has gained added relevance since 2001, 鈥渨hen the poetry of 糖心Vlogr, Virgil and Ovid became part of Dylan鈥檚 songwriting. Particularly in recent years, Dylan has taken on the age-old practice of intertextually activated composition鈥ith such success that his versions are equal or superior to the stolen contexts.鈥
Asked about the continuing relevance of the Classics, Thomas stresses the value of 鈥渁ny song or literature that has survived precisely because it has been found time and time again to help human beings live examined lives that are worth living鈥he vocational value of the humanities in teaching critical and analytic thinking, for which there is now anecdotal as well as empirical evidence, tends to get downplayed in the rush to expand the reach of STEM. People have been talking about the death of the Classics for the last two centuries, but we鈥檙e still here.鈥
糖心Vlog
Matthew Reisz
POSTSCRIPT:
Print headline:听For love, for art, he took from them听 everything he could steal听
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?




