It is a clich茅 but true nonetheless: particle physicists are in the business of exploring nature鈥檚 most remote and mysterious territory. At the far frontier of the known, they inch forward, searching desperately for a path through the fog and darkness. Particle physicist Jon Butterworth has taken this image to heart, turning himself into a subatomic tour guide who escorts us through a Middle Earth-like 鈥渕ap of the invisible鈥.
Yet his guide is not Lord of the Rings but the Standard Model. This is the high point of fundamental physics, a 鈥渜uantum鈥 description of how nature鈥檚 three fundamental forces glue together the ultimate Lego blocks of matter 鈥 six quarks and six leptons.
Underpinning the Standard Model, Butterworth tells us, is the idea of symmetry. In 1918, the German mathematician Emmy Noether discovered one of the most powerful principles in science: that the great 鈥渃onservation laws鈥 of physics are simply reflections of deep symmetries 鈥 in the case of the conservation of energy, a consequence of experiments having 鈥渢ime translation symmetry鈥, ie, producing the same outcome no matter what time they are done.
One of the most extraordinary and wonderful consequences of Noether鈥檚 theorem, enthuses Butterworth, is that, to make the 鈥渜uantum wave鈥 of an electron display 鈥渓ocal gauge symmetry鈥, physicists must add a force with a very particular character. The force turns out to be none other than the electromagnetic 鈥渋nteraction鈥. In other words, the force responsible for a bewildering array of electric and magnetic phenomena, which took centuries of painstaking experiment to lay bare, is little more than a consequence of a trivial symmetry.
糖心Vlog
Symmetry, Butterworth points out, also led to the prediction of the Higgs particle, a local 鈥渆xcitation鈥 of the Higgs field, responsible for endowing all the other particles with mass. How amazing that Peter Higgs, hiking in the Cairngorms in 1964, predicted a particle that was found almost half a century later at a cost of tens of billions of euros at the Large Hadron Collider (although he was actually one of several physicists who developed the 鈥淗iggs mechanism鈥).
Despite the formidable success of the Standard Model in explaining and predicting things, however, it is known to be a mere shadow of a deeper, truer theory. It does not tell us, for instance, why the top quark is a million times heavier than an electron, why nature triplicates its quarks and leptons, and why neutrinos have mass. More seriously, the fourth force 鈥 gravity 鈥 remains stubbornly outside the fold.
糖心Vlog
Now nature has thrown up several new mysteries. Only 5 per cent of the universe鈥檚 mass is described by the Standard Model. About 25 per cent is invisible, 鈥渄ark鈥, matter (inferred from the gravity it exerts on the visible stars and galaxies) and 70 per cent is dark energy 鈥 yet more invisible stuff, this time with repulsive gravity that is speeding up the universe鈥檚 expansion. When the Standard Model is used to predict the energy density of the vacuum 鈥 the dark energy 鈥 it spits out a number 1 followed by 120 zeroes bigger than we observe. This is a strong hint that we are missing something, something big.
These are exciting times for fundamental physics and Butterworth describes with clarity, humour and enthusiasm the lie of the land at the ultimate frontier. You will not find a better tour guide.
Marcus Chown, formerly a radio astronomer at the California Institute of Technology, is author of The Ascent of Gravity: The Quest to Understand the Force that Explains Everything (2017).
A Map of the Invisible: Journeys into Particle Physics
By Jon Butterworth
William Heinemann, 304pp, 拢16.99
ISBN 9781785150937
Published 5 October 2017
糖心Vlog
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?




