It鈥檚 been a fine game. The home side are taking their slim lead into the last minute. There鈥檚 just one final corner to defend and all three points are secured. The cross arrives, expertly placed under the crossbar. Veteran goalkeeper Wyn Grant rises above the heads. Reaching out for the ball, he takes it securely. As he lands, though, it jumps out of his hands. He tries to recover, but the assistant referee signals a goal.
One of the attractions of football is that most games keep us captivated to the very end, as does Grant鈥檚 exploration of the largely unregulated economics of football. Despite the apparent success of the world鈥檚 most popular sport, this mainly UK-centric survey shows that deep down it鈥檚 a mess. In just about any other market, such chaotic behaviour would see a higher rate of failure. Football clubs survive, despite financial recklessness, because of the passion the game evokes.
Regulation is the theme throughout, and its largely ineffective track record. The English game is in an especially bad place in this regard, in contrast to Germany, because of our economically liberal and individualistic tradition that leans towards self-regulation or deregulation. The consistent failures of such an approach are catalogued in eye-watering detail. Football鈥檚 major problems with dodgy owners, racism, gambling and sexism have barely been tackled, despite the occasional nice words or campaign. The game is rife with sponsorship and even ownership by betting companies. Even 鈥渞esponsible gambling鈥 warnings still push the idea that gambling is fun and that those with addictions are simply doing it wrong.
The chapter on women鈥檚 football is the strongest, detailing the long history of sexism, misogyny and patriarchy in the game. Grant weaves a compelling narrative from historical reports of early women鈥檚 games, where journalists would be outraged at the players鈥 attire, as not markedly feminine enough, and a good player would be accused of being a man in disguise. Misogyny persists, perhaps less overtly, but the pay gap between the men鈥檚 and women鈥檚 games is now a chasm. The ban on competitive women鈥檚 football in England was removed as recently as 1971 and it is disappointing to see how we have still not progressed beyond notions of delicate femininity that have led to a protective attitude towards women鈥檚 sports. I would recommend this chapter to anyone working in gender studies or sports sciences.
糖心Vlog
After such a catalogue of regulatory failure, and appeals for a stronger approach, the reader鈥檚 hopes are raised of receiving some positive recommendations. This hope is largely disappointed. Suggestions from others are dismissed before, in the last few pages, we get the author鈥檚 proposal for a statutory regulator (Ofsoc). Since 鈥渋ts remit would principally be concerned with the financial probity of the clubs鈥, however, this would do nothing to address the problems of racism, globalisation, sexism and gambling that have been so compellingly detailed. There are highs and lows in every game. At the very end, keeper Grant drops the ball. Nevertheless, this is a book of two halves with plenty of worthwhile material in the good half.
Stephen Mumford is professor of metaphysics at Durham University.
糖心Vlog
Political Football: Regulation, Globalization and the Market
By Wyn Grant
Agenda, 192pp, 拢60.00 (hardback) and 拢19.99
ISBN 9781788213509 (hardback) and 9781788213516
Published 27 May 2021
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?








