糖心Vlog

Making Marie Curie: Intellectual Property and Celebrity Culture in an Age of Information, by Eva Hemmungs Wirt茅n

Robyn Arianrhod welcomes an unsentimental study of the first woman to win a Nobel prize

Published on
April 30, 2015
Last updated
January 27, 2016

When the widowed Marie Curie had an affair with fellow scientist Paul Langevin, their letters were stolen and leaked: the right-wing press had a field day, and five duels were fought to avenge Polish-born Curie鈥檚 honour. She had been accused of calculatingly 鈥 鈥渟cientifically鈥 鈥 leading Langevin away from his virtuous French wife: sexism and nationalism neatly packaged! These attacks sound tiresomely modern, but this was 1911, and Curie was already a 鈥渃elebrity鈥.

Gender, celebrity and modernity are themes in Making Marie Curie, and Eva Hemmungs Wirt茅n offers some fascinating historical details. These include the gender and race politics that shaped the media鈥檚 response both to the affair and to Curie鈥檚 failed bid for membership of the French Academy of Sciences. There鈥檚 also 鈥淢issy鈥 Brown Meloney鈥檚 extraordinary celebrity-building campaign that enticed American women to raise the equivalent of $1 million to fund Curie鈥檚 research. After all, Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel prize 鈥 and she won two of them 鈥 yet she was constantly struggling to fund her laboratory. This 鈥渃rowd-funded鈥 response by women to Curie鈥檚 poverty sounds inspiring, but Wirt茅n is not interested in heroic tales. Her aim is to deconstruct the Curie 鈥渕yth鈥 and, in the process, make 鈥渁 modest contribution to rewriting the history of modern science鈥.

It is an important goal and Wirt茅n has some startlingly unsentimental opinions: she sees science as 鈥渁 cult of genius and of masculinity鈥 in Curie鈥檚 time, yet she is none too sympathetic to Curie, either. Her first chapter title reveals her position: 鈥淢e, myself, I: In the interest of disinterestedness.鈥 She wants to show that there were two Curies: the altruistic public persona we revere, and the woman who worked tirelessly behind the scenes to secure the Curie legacy, and to control funding (including donations) for research into 鈥渉er鈥 elements 鈥 radium and polonium 鈥 even though she had given them away freely to science. She was, we read, a woman who claimed it was unethical to patent a naturally occurring element, even as she benefited from royalties on Pierre Curie鈥檚 patents on scientific instruments, and fought for intellectual property rights for scientists. Of course, there is a difference between patenting a naturally occurring element (or gene) and an invention, and Wirt茅n offers some insightful discussion on this complex topic. Unfortunately, it comes late in the book, after much has been made of the apparent contradictions in Curie鈥檚 actions.

Wirt茅n, it seems, sometimes confuses disinterestedness with altruism: scientific 鈥渄isinterestedness鈥 refers to the ability to make impartial contributions to the content of science, but she touches only briefly on the increasingly murky relationship between celebrity, funding and content. Nevertheless, she does raise some significant issues 鈥 such as whether or not the Curies鈥 refusal to patent radium served to benefit the radium industry rather than disinterested scientific research.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

She also documents the first attempt to establish a universal scientific bibliography, which she sees as the beginning of the open-access information age. It was a vital task, to which Curie contributed via the League of Nations. Curie was also a key player in the league鈥檚 attempt to find a way to reward scientists for 鈥減ure鈥 as well as 鈥渁pplied鈥 research. In light of current constraints on research funding, and the debate over who should pay for scientific and other content, Wirt茅n鈥檚 excellent account of the complexity of the 1930s intellectual property debate is timely.

Using Curie as the vehicle for discussion on all the themes in this thought-provoking book is a strategy that enables Wirt茅n to draw a far more complex portrait than that of the legendary wife patiently stirring radioactive pitchblende, content to remain in her husband鈥檚 shadow.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Robyn Arianrhod is adjunct research fellow in the School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, and author of Seduced by Logic: 脡milie du Ch芒telet, Mary Somerville and the Newtonian Revolution (2012).

Making Marie Curie: Intellectual Property and Celebrity Culture in an Age of Information

By Eva Hemmungs Wirt茅n
University of Chicago Press, 248pp, 拢24.50
ISBN 9780226235844 and 5981 (e-book)
Published 27 April 2015

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT