Critics make expansive claims about poetry, but can get tripped up by poems that refute their thesis. Perhaps our poets can better articulate the climate of opinion on the art and its cultural role. Poetry, after all, is an abstraction, while poems are art-objects. Robert Frost warns that abstractions become 鈥渁 new toy in the hands of the artists鈥, yet those hands are richly marked from working on poems. And so we might trust them to grapple with murky Platonic forms, as poet Louise Gl眉ck manages in her essays on American versions of originality, narcissism, realism and revenge, along with topics closer to her own verse: estrangement and the fear of happiness.
Gl眉ck鈥檚 poems shift from mythic re-enactment to dour meditation. Her most famous lines, perhaps, come from the dark petals of Mock Orange: 鈥淚 hate them as I hate sex,/the man鈥檚 mouth/sealing my mouth鈥︹. What, then, to expect in her prose? The essays are quick and associative, darkly amusing, ironic and sceptical. American Originality first depicts 鈥渨hite America鈥檚 myth of itself鈥: 鈥渁 nation of escaped convicts, younger sons, persecuted minorities, and opportunists鈥, a myth elaborated in 鈥渋mages and narratives of self-invention鈥. The old American cult of the new. Readers looking for observations on America鈥檚 present identity-melodrama will be disappointed: the title-essay was published in the prelapsarian year of 2001. The other essays are 10-20 years old.
No matter: Gl眉ck鈥檚 piquant declarations won鈥檛 fold like calendar pages. Droll and contrarian, she calls American culture 鈥渁 curious hybrid of Romanticism and psychiatry鈥 and 鈥渁lmost fascistic in its enforcement of optimism鈥. This produces 鈥減oets looking inward [who] have begun, simultaneously, to watch themselves looking inward鈥. Gl眉ck can be paradoxical (鈥渄etachment is entirely preoccupied with the self鈥), aphoristic (鈥渄urability distinguishes the archetypal from the anecdotal鈥) and, despite winning the Pulitzer, the National Book Award and the US Poet Laureateship, wilfully obscure: 鈥淭he selflessness, the receptivity, which are, formally, the inventions of this art, are, if one reads closely, slightly tainted by an overriding impression of the autocratic or controlling.鈥
American Originality聽features astute readings of accomplished poets such as Stephen Dobyns, Robert Pinsky and Frank Bidart 鈥 and the craggy shadows behind them, Rainer Maria Rilke, Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson. Gl眉ck鈥檚 court of inquiry also turns towards her younger self, cataloguing her climb out of revenge impulses and the safety of despair.
糖心Vlog
Originality is not found in experimental poetics: 鈥渘o showy contempt for grammar, no murky lacunae, no cult of logic鈥. Rather, it reveals the 鈥渋nstinct, guesswork, nerve鈥 of an idiosyncratic mind. But rather than sail away on theories of original poetry, Gl眉ck grounds her claims in 10 essays introducing the Yale Younger Poets series that she chose and edited extensively 鈥 her commitment to the art and to emerging artists, which she calls 鈥渙ne of the great experiences of my life鈥.
糖心Vlog
In all, Gl眉ck鈥檚 prose answers her poems鈥 crystalline hardness in a quieter tone: compassion. 鈥淏y giving form to devastation, the poem rescues the reader from a darkness without shape or gravity鈥n island in a free fall.鈥
David Gewanter is a professor of English at Georgetown University. His latest book of poems is Fort Necessity (2018).
American Originality: Essays on Poetry
By Louise Gl眉ck
Farrar, Straus & Giroux
208pp, 拢18.80 and 拢12.15
ISBN 9780374299552 and 9780374537463
Published 4 March 2018
POSTSCRIPT:
Print headline:聽Chapters on abstract verse
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?








