糖心Vlog

BIS grant letter suggests most popular destinations will get more places

Published on
January 17, 2013
Last updated
May 22, 2015

Universities with lower student demand will have places cut in 2014 and beyond to reward more popular institutions, the government has signalled.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills released its annual grant letter on 14 January, unveiling funding and policy priorities for 2013-14.

The letter, sent to the 糖心Vlog Funding Council for England by Vince Cable, the business secretary, and David Willetts, the universities and science minister, confirms that the grade threshold for unlimited recruitment will be lowered to ABB next year - not BBB or below, as some in the sector had urged.

Mr Cable and Mr Willetts write that 鈥済iven the pattern of recruitment in 2012-13鈥, the government has 鈥渢he flexibility to apply student number controls less rigidly in 2013-14鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The underspend from 2012-13, when there was a shortfall in student numbers, is being reinvested to fund extra places in 2013-14, the letter suggests.

On 5,000 core-and-margin places, previously expected to be deducted from universities鈥 existing allocations then reallocated, the letter advises Hefce that 鈥測ou do not need to make a corresponding cut to the core鈥 to create the places.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The letter also eases the punishment facing universities that recruit too many students. For 2013-14, institutions will be allowed 鈥渢o recruit up to 3 per cent above their total recruitment of Hefce fundable students鈥, the ministers write.

鈥淭his buffer zone would allow institutions to avoid grant reductions for minor over-recruitment.鈥

Libby Hackett, chief executive of the University Alliance, said she was 鈥渞eally pleased with the emphasis on both stability and flexibility, flexibility in particular鈥.

Andy Westwood, chief executive of GuildHE, said the 3 per cent buffer zone was 鈥渟ensible鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

He added: 鈥淲hat it does is it allows successful institutions attracting lots of demand to not be paralysed by fear of fines. Just look back at the past 18 months of language around over-recruitment. It has been quite punitive.鈥

Mr Cable and Mr Willetts also say that they would like Hefce 鈥渢o further liberalise the system from 2014-15鈥, advising it 鈥渢o consider increasing the flexibility for those institutions that have shown strong recruitment patterns in 2013-14 and taper this away from institutions enjoying less demand鈥.

Dominic Shellard, vice-chancellor of De Montfort University, said on Twitter that the letter was 鈥渉ighly significant鈥. 鈥淚t confirms the ever more Darwinian direction of the sector in terms of admissions. Problematic,鈥 he posted.

Ms Hackett said that BBB might be the 鈥渘ext step down the ladder鈥, or there 鈥渕ight be other ways鈥 of relaxing student number controls for institutions with higher demand. Ideas were being discussed in the sector on continuing 鈥渢he principle of ABB in opening up the market, but perhaps finding a more flexible and sophisticated way of doing it鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, there is bad news for higher education staff hoping for a pay rise that breaks the recent trend for below-inflation settlements.

鈥淲e expect the sector to continue to operate restraint in relation to staff pay,鈥 write Mr Cable and Mr Willetts. They also call for 鈥渇urther efficiencies鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

john.morgan@tsleducation.com.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT