糖心Vlog

Appeal of appeals firm: it鈥檚 not just money-making, says founder

Medical ethics academic and company founder defends controversial business. Chris Parr reports

Published on
August 8, 2013
Last updated
May 22, 2015

An academic who founded a company that charges between 拢500 and 拢1,000 for assistance in appealing against university grading decisions has defended the enterprise against allegations it is profiteering from students鈥 fears.

Daniel Sokol, a barrister and honorary senior lecturer in medical ethics and law at King鈥檚 College London, set up Alpha Academic Appeals last year, which offers legal advice to students who 鈥渉ave recently failed an exam but wish to appeal the decision鈥.

Cases range from undergraduates who have failed an academic year to doctoral students who have spent years writing theses only to be told that they do not come up to scratch. Although law firms have offered advice to students on educational matters before, Alpha Academic Appeals appears to be one of the first in the UK set up specifically to target those unhappy with their university exam results.

Speaking to 糖心Vlog, Dr聽Sokol 鈥 who also works as a magician and is a columnist for the British Medical Journal 鈥 denied that his company was encouraging a litigious culture in the academy and capitalising on the fears of students in the high fees age.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淭hey are not children 鈥 they are adults and they can make decisions,鈥 he said. 鈥淸In some cases] they鈥檝e spent five years of their life on their PhD and, quite bluntly, they feel they鈥檝e been screwed by their university because their adviser completely ignored them, or they think there鈥檚 been some bias in the examination process, or an examiner had no experience of assessing PhDs.

鈥淚f they decide it is sufficiently important for them to go to a professional and pay some money for it, then in my view that鈥檚 their decision. I don鈥檛 think it is profiteering at all.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

He conceded that academic colleagues had told him in private that they believed the company to be a 鈥渢errible idea鈥 that might encourage a sense of entitlement among students who are paying thousands of pounds. Such people, he said, seem to believe that university assessors 鈥渘ever make mistakes鈥.

Rachel Wenstone, the National Union of Students鈥 vice-president (higher education), said the service encouraged a more litigious approach from aggrieved students that could leave universities feeling like 鈥淎merican hospitals 鈥 terrified of people suing them鈥.

鈥淪tudents鈥 unions offer very good advice and they offer it for free. Any 鈥onetisation around student appeals is only going to be damaging for those who can鈥檛 afford to access it,鈥 she added.

Dr Sokol said he always recommended that clients first contact their students鈥 union, but added that many 鈥渟ay that they have already been and it hasn鈥檛 been very helpful鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淚t鈥檚 not just a money-making exercise,鈥 he added. 鈥淚 help students 鈥rticulate what they want to say in a persuasive and compelling way for a fee. What鈥檚 wrong with that?鈥

A spokeswoman for King鈥檚 said that the university 鈥渋n no way endorses Alpha Academic Appeals鈥.

She added that it had asked Dr聽Sokol to remove a mention of his association with the institution from the company鈥檚 website.

chris.parr@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT