糖心Vlog

‘Gruesome’ workloads ‘undermine academics’ health’

Excess work hours ‘consistently’ correlate with ‘moderate to severe’ anxiety and depression, Australian survey finds

六月 26, 2025
Clocking on system
Source: iStock/EyeOfPaul

A non-stop workload of nine hours a day is taking a quantifiable toll on academics’ mental health, Australian researchers have found.

The survey conducted by academics at Federation and Victoria universities has revealed that teaching and research staff are performing around four hours of overtime for every five hours of paid work, on average.

pending its publication in a peer-reviewed health journal, the study uncovered an “adjusted annual workload” of 3,256 hours. This far exceeded the “standard” 1,824 hours – 38 hours a week for 48 weeks a year.

The finding suggests that academics work an average of eight hours and 55 minutes a day, 365 days a year. “Nine hours labour every day? You’d get less for manslaughter,” Tim Winkler, publisher of the Future Campus newsletter.

The report acknowledges that “selection bias” may have influenced the results from the online survey, which was made available to every Australian university and completed by 626 academic staff. Lead author Eliza Zentveld said previous research had also found that people tended to overestimate their efforts by about 10 per cent when they self-reported their working hours.

“But even being conservative and accounting for that, the hours are quite gruesome,” said Zentveld, professor of social justice at Federation University and a former chair of the institution’s academic board.

“We’ve got enough of a dataset to show…a pattern which correlates with anecdotal information that people are working into the night. Their annual leave is not separate; weekends are merged into the working week. That delineation point gets a bit murky.”

The survey found that one-quarter of academics experienced depression, compared?with one-sixth of the general community. One in four academics also suffered moderate to severe anxiety, against a community backdrop of one in 13. Workloads played a direct role, with every excess hour increasing the risk of anxiety or depression by between 0.01 and 0.02 percentage points.

Zentveld said these associations were based on accepted measures known as the Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalised Anxiety Disorder scales. “[Our] statistician…consistently found a correlation between working excess hours and having anxiety and depression levels above the clinical cut-off scores.”

She said?academic workloads had intensified since Covid-19, with staff constantly pushed to be more efficient while simultaneously being slugged with additional compliance, quality and student feedback duties.

Zentveld said professionals in other fields also experienced excessive workloads, and the issue in universities could have been exaggerated by academics’ propensity to research themselves. She said academia benefited from an unusual level of flexibility in working hours and locations.

But academics’ workloads “just can’t be done in the time frame”, leaving them a choice of giving away their time or doing their work badly. “This is leading to some poor ethical decisions by some academics, too, where they’re looking at cutting corners.”

She said that while academics’ working habits occasionally became “extreme”, excess hours were routine. “It’s the nature of the job. If you’re supervising PhD students, you want to be responsive to them. To just…disappear for several weeks can have its own set of problems.

“Often there’s very tight turnaround time. A research article might have been accepted, and they need you to proofread [it] in the next 24 hours. You can’t say, ‘I’ll get back to you in a few weeks’.”

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (13)

It's the same in the land of the poms as well mates! Strewth, they work us hard!
It's the high investment in 'mental energy currency' that makes the work of an academic very 'gruesome' . One hour of work by an academic is equivalent to about five hours of work in a factory or other work places. The 'mental energy currency' investment is very high, thus impacting on the health and wellbeing of academics. So it's more about the quality of work than the number of hours. My opinion!
I think it would be very hard to convince someone working in one area that we academics actually work five time harder than them per hour. I think they would laugh in our faces if we made this claim. I don't think that many academics would last long working in a factory. I did that kind of work when I was a student in vacations etc and it was truly exhausting and I ws younger and fitter then. Please give me mental exhaustion over physical exhaustion any day! Look out the window occasionally!
I agree. I know and have known many professionals, teachers, accountants, social workers, solicitors etc etc and they all say much the same thing that they work and have to work 60-70 hours and the stress and deadlines are terrible etc etc. It is accepted in many professions (which are competitive) that this is something that you just have to do in the fabled "real world" as they call it. I would also say that the message certainly does not get through to the public as they look at our teaching hours, class sizes (compared with school), the length of our teaching semesters (they tend to think we swan off over summer to Greece or the South of France "researching". So it is a very hard case to push if we done;t have something more substantial with which to plead our case. Often the overwork and stress is, in my view (though I stand to be corrected) scheduling in that we get clobbered with everything at specific times. Like getting 300 essays to mark in two weeks and meet a publishers deadline, while organising a conference or symposium. That's the kind of thing that can damage our mental health and lead to distress. Some people, especially the younger colleague, are able to deal with this but it's harder the older one gets. I used to routinely work through the night preparing lectures, marking etc etc at these particular pressure points. But that's not sustainable.
Academics should be much firmer about what they do and when. Research, teaching, and admin/ service add up to at least 60-70 hours p.w if we are being realistic. I've tried to cut it in half, slow it down, do it only in paid working hours. Otherwise everyone else is profiting from our work except academics- and the thing we most need is time and space to think.
I do think this is very over exaggerated and academics seem to assume that they are the only professional (if we can call them that) people actually working long hours. All the professions have to do this. I also know of many cases of colleagues who frankly do very little but the basic minimum in terms of teaching and research and seem to rub along very well indeed. Admittedly, such cases are becoming fewer. And of course, the public and the press seem to view us as having a very easy life working for only 30 weeks a year etc etc. I also know of many cases of academics who are dedicated and driven and work all the time, but they would do that whatever profession they enter because they are workaholics. Indeed, many of my colleagues actually like working long hours when it concerns their research projects. One area where I think we do have a case is that we are expected to perform on a series of fronts, research, admin and teaching (involving pastoral, advising, mental health awareness etc), with quite extraordinary multi-tasking demands which can be exhausting much in excess of the actual hours involved.
Good points! One thing I would like to add to the debate (if I may), is that we academics actually do a great deal of unpaid (or very nominally paid) work as part of the teaching and research infrastructure. Reading MS, reviewing articles for journals, examining, externallings of various kinds. Recently I undertook a large programme review for a major University. It took me many days to read through all the docs sent and then to write up the detailed review. I was paid ?200 (less tax deducted at source) which in no way represented my work or expertise. Solicitors usually charge ?350 per hour these dats for example (just a comparison) Of course, we do these tasks reciprocally and not for the income per se tho keep the system going and we also learn much from them. They also feature in our professional development (promotions etc), but it is subsidised or unpaid labour. So, this certainly is an area where we might start pushing for more realistic re-imbursement from Universities, academic publishers etc now that the squeeze is on elsewhere? or, we could just decide not to do them. I have noticed that it is getting harder and harder to find good externals willing to do these tasks. But we should stress that we do a lot of things to keep the system going which are not part of our contractual duties and are nor remunerated well if at all?
And I think Heads should be much firmer in allocating duties fairly and evenly across Schools. It does seem to be the same people who often carry the biggest burden with the big admin tasks. We'd also have to have a measurable and reasonable notion of research productivity.
Hear! Hear! This is the elephant in the room- fair work allocation. There are those academics who routinely get away with less teaching, personal tutoring, marking and so on. There is also the income generation bit. Those academics in large schools with over 700 students per cohort are worked off their feet to subsidise other non income generation schools/departments. There is no recompense for the extra hours they put in.
One thing I would say is that I find a lot of my work is now focused on the semester when then pressures are highest. We are not able to spread out our work evenly over the year but do have to do an awful lots in the teaching periods (and we have to keep researching do our admin etc etc). WLM tend to take the whole year into consideration and never really do justice to the intensity of semester time work. So we get the worst of both worlds here as it were.
Colleagues will tell me they are working 70 hours per week, but then when we apply the WLM methodology those hours tend to disappear very rapidly. There is frequently a substantial disparity with what colleagues say they are working and what they have been allocated. We can account for this in various ways. We can question the WLM (and various models are in use some less valid than others) as inaccurate or under-representing what we do but I suppose there has to be some form of methodology to use to try to allocate the various tasks and ensure some kind of fairness in the allocation, especially of the large admin tasks. We do need some data, however rudimentary. Colleagues also tell me that they are working extremely hard but on tasks often not captured by the WLM when these tasks were never allocated to them in the first place, but things they quite like doing and think they should have represented as part of their work load. Some are allocated a role with a weighting but claim the weighting is not enough. But it is a truth that it takes some people longer to do a task than others. So it's not as simple as this blanket assertion. I think we have to be very careful with the claim that we are working 60-70 hours a week routinely throughout the year and must have solid data to back that up. Just stating we do or that our work is somehow privileged over the labour of others I am afraid won't pass muster.
Yes I would like to see the evidence for this tbh. Do the workload allocations actually bear this out? One way would be to select a number of colleagues representatively and request them to complete a work diary for a period of time (another task!) and then to compare this data with the workload allocated to them to see if the hours tally. I would say that there are some roles which are extremely onerous (Head of Dept, Director of Studies or Teaching, Research Director) and which we all know take more time that is every allocated, but we all share in these and do them periodically (or should do).
new
I do not think these are overestimates, there likely are a lot of variation between academics depending on the size of research team, number of grants, and probably discipline (as experimentalist working many hours in the lab is a reality very different from the illusion of flexibility in working locations and perhaps that all academics are working comfortably from home). Fact is that work load models generally cover the 60% teaching and admin duties and it is expected that everything else falls in the 40% research time. This includes all the unpaid work as external examiner, peer reviewer, editor, program committes. Of course writing grants sucks up a really large portion of time much of which is wasted due to low success rates. PhD supervision is considered part of research time at least in our department (typically 6-8 PhDs in my team with weekly meetings and lab supervision), working against tight project deliverable deadlines and periodic grant reporting (can get particularly stressful when working in government and EU projects), financial management/oversight of up to 20 different budgets, laboratory technical management including most of our own IT on >10 lab workstations. And actually finding time to think and develop original new ideas. Going to conferences to build networks, present work and develop new consortia. Writing support letters for tutees and group members, mentoring and development of ECRs, conducting periodic appraisals, recruitment of new staff on projects, wrapping up all the unfinished business people leave behind when they finish their contract, general business continuity, knowledge retention and transfer of know-how in the research group, writing long overdue publications, revising PhD theses at the last minute. And the endless amount of red tape, paperwork, compliance and REF reporting. In a nutshell the life of a UK balanced pathway academic. Of course this all fits snugly in our 40% FTE research workload, where most of the time I also have >40% funded PI time on my grants so am supposed to spend all of this time on my projects and not on all the other things. Also as discussed the 60% teaching&admin is averaged over the year so much higher in term time. Still a fun job to do, and with relative job security and ok salary, but a healty work life balance is very hard to achieve if you like to run a serious activity.
ADVERTISEMENT